Relative scale
SS6 represents a smaller nominal size direction than SS10. That relationship affects how many visual units may fit into a given stroke or curve.
Compare SS6 and SS10 as design directions inside a complete transfer—not as a shortcut to “more detail” or “more sparkle.” Teebling helps buyers review artwork scale, open space, stone layout, viewing distance, receiving product and a physical sample before the stone-size choice is approved.

SS names are size designations used to organize stone choices, but a buyer should request the actual specification associated with the quoted reference. Do not convert a web chart into production spacing without confirmation. Design around the supplied diameter or tolerance information and approve a physical sample.
SS6 represents a smaller nominal size direction than SS10. That relationship affects how many visual units may fit into a given stroke or curve.
Ask Teebling to identify the stone, color and relevant dimensions for the selected product. Keep that reference with the artwork proof.
Size, spacing, gaps, carrier layout and finished artwork scale work together. None should be approved in isolation.
Use an SS6 mapped version to see what the smaller nominal scale direction actually does inside the fixed artwork box. Compare critical corners, counters, curves and the complete silhouette. The useful version is the one that communicates the design on its end product—not the one with the most coordinates.
A smaller nominal unit can provide more placement choices inside compact features. That does not guarantee legibility: tight spacing, weak contrast or an undersized logo can still fail. Inspect whether the design becomes busy or whether tiny gaps remain visually open.
Map the same outside dimensions with the SS10 direction and compare the result beside SS6. Do not enlarge one proof or change the garment mockup between views. The comparison should expose the trade between available placement positions, open space and the broader visual unit.
A larger nominal unit can produce a bolder point pattern with fewer positions available inside the same field. Curves, corners and narrow strokes may need a different path or larger artwork. Review the complete mark from the intended viewing distance.
Build spacing from the confirmed physical stone reference, the intended carrier construction and the artwork. Preserve open areas between neighboring rows and around counters. A mockup that lets circles overlap may look smooth on screen but does not represent a reviewable physical map.
Use the quoted diameter or reference for scale. Avoid undocumented conversions from category names.
Define a repeatable relationship between adjacent units while allowing curves and corners to resolve appropriately.
Compare the complete visual stroke, not only the centerline. Larger units can change outside dimensions.
Protect intentional holes and negative shapes so letters, symbols and facial features remain recognizable.
Count is an output of the approved design map, not a target to inflate or minimize without context. At fixed artwork dimensions, a smaller stone direction may allow a different number of placements than a larger one, but row structure and necessary gaps also change. Request both mapped count and outside dimensions from the actual proof.
Commercial terms can depend on the confirmed construction, stone selection, quantity and design complexity. Do not calculate pricing from an assumed count or publish a generic rate. Teebling should quote the reviewed artwork and order scope in writing.
A transfer for a close-view accessory, front-chest graphic and event garment may need different visual priorities. Place both candidate proofs on the actual receiving product and review them at the ordinary distance for that use. Lighting and garment color should be relevant to the decision.
Inspect counters, line endings and small internal shapes. Confirm that detail remains intentional rather than granular noise.
View the complete mark on the body or shaped product. Check contrast, scale and whether the silhouette reads before individual stones.
Judge the primary symbol or word from the program’s relevant distance without claiming a universal visibility result.
A mixed-size design should assign a clear role to each stone direction. Combining sizes simply to add variety can weaken rhythm, complicate interfaces and make inspection harder. Submit a complete coordinate map and ask Teebling to confirm availability and construction for the proposed combination.
May be proposed for compact accents, tapered transitions or internal features where the mapped proof remains clear.
May be proposed for the main outline, broad symbol or selected emphasis where the artwork supports it.
Both sizes share a controlled origin, color schedule, carrier plan, product test and physical sample decision.

The sample should represent the selected stone reference, mapped artwork, carrier or supplied format, receiving product and application route. Compare the one-to-one proof with the physical result, then record observations under ordinary and relevant directed light.
Finished outside dimensions and placement field
Stone reference and color direction as quoted
Critical counters, gaps, curves and endpoints
Carrier release and application observations
Complete mark at the intended viewing distance
Sample code, artwork revision and reviewer decision
These answers keep the comparison tied to confirmed physical references and project-specific artwork.
No. A smaller stone-size direction can support finer mapping, but clarity also depends on finished scale, gaps, stone arrangement and the actual design. Compare mapped proofs and approve a physical sample for the selected construction.
No universal brightness result should be assumed. Larger visual units can create a different presence, while color, finish, spacing, viewing conditions and artwork all affect appearance. Approve the actual stone and sample under relevant light.
Ask Teebling to confirm the dimensions and tolerances associated with the quoted stone reference. Do not build critical artwork from an unverified web conversion; use the supplied specification and physical sample for final spacing.
A mixed-size concept can be submitted for review, but interfaces, spacing, carrier handling and availability need confirmation. Define a clear role for each size and approve the full physical composition rather than two isolated samples.
Send authorized vector artwork, finished dimensions, receiving product, placement, intended viewing distance, color direction, candidate size or mixed-size questions, quantity and any existing Teebling reference. Include the difficult details you want protected.
Send authorized vector artwork, finished dimensions, candidate size direction, receiving product, placement, viewing context, color direction, quantity and destination. Teebling will review the mapped options and quote the confirmed transfer construction.