00_SOURCEBuyer-approved artwork
Current editable logo or motif with known ownership, paths, type treatment and artwork lockup.
A production-usable handoff does more than attach a logo. It identifies the approved source, fixes physical size, explains color and placement intent, and preserves every mapped revision. Teebling uses that context to discuss a custom transfer without turning missing information into unsupported feasibility promises.

Organize files by purpose so the mapper can distinguish the authoritative source from visual references and order context. A folder full of unnamed screenshots should not decide the production artwork.
00_SOURCECurrent editable logo or motif with known ownership, paths, type treatment and artwork lockup.
01_CONTEXTGarment photograph or drawing, intended location, orientation and the physical field available for decoration.
02_COLORStable zone names linked to approved visual or physical color references rather than an unmanaged screen impression.
03_ORDEREvery artwork, size, color and garment configuration listed separately with a buyer-created item identity.
Add a short read-me that names the active source and explains any missing information. Keep old proofs outside the active handoff folder. This simple hierarchy reduces the chance that a reference image or superseded file is mistaken for the approved design.
Editable vector paths are useful because outlines and zones can be inspected at physical scale. The file extension alone does not prove that artwork is clean, complete or current.
Provide the buyer-approved path artwork with fonts handled intentionally and linked elements included. Remove hidden exploratory layers that could create ambiguity, or label them clearly as non-production references.
Export a view that shows the intended lockup, color relationships and orientation. This lets reviewers compare the mapped proof with the buyer’s visual target.
State finished width and height in physical units and identify the garment or accessory. Do not rely on the artboard size or an email subject line.
Before upload, open the source on another workstation or run the buyer’s own package check. Verify that paths, type, images and color labels display as expected. Teebling can review the submitted material, but it should not have to choose between several conflicting files.
A reference image can communicate mood, placement or a previous product, but it may hide low-resolution edges, unknown dimensions and uncontrolled color. Label it as context rather than allowing it to become the silent production source.
If the buyer lacks editable art, state which image is the best available reference and who can approve a redraw. If size is undecided, provide the usable garment field and ask for mapped options rather than requesting a finished proof with no scale.
Missing color references, unknown typefaces or an unconfirmed logo lockup should remain visible as open questions. A proposed interpretation must be named and reviewed; it should never be described as an exact match without evidence.
The gap report protects both sides. It allows a quote or review to focus on work that is actually defined and prevents assumptions from becoming hidden specifications.

A rhinestone map is a physical arrangement. Fix the intended width and height before detailed mapping so stones, gaps and line relationships can be judged at actual size.
Do not provide only “medium” or one approximate width. State the constrained dimension and confirm whether proportions must remain locked.
Mark the intended placement on a garment or accessory and identify the product size represented by the reference.
If the design is needed at several physical sizes, request distinct maps and approval records. Scaling can change detail and stone rhythm.
Review the features that determine recognition before filling decorative areas. Rhinestones render discrete nodes; very fine continuous artwork may need a buyer-approved interpretation.
Identify the letters, counters, gaps, symbols and outer contours that cannot disappear. Rank them so a proposed simplification protects the most important information first.
An enlarged proof supports technical inspection, but the actual-size view reveals whether small details remain readable.
Use enough visual space between paths and color zones so neighboring stones do not merge into a new shape.
Overlay or list proposed changes and obtain explicit approval rather than describing the map as automatically identical.
Once approved, connect the map to the exact dimensions and remove superseded versions from the active handoff.
A zone name gives buyers, mappers and sample reviewers a shared language. It is more dependable than pointing to a screen and asking for “that blue.”
Link the most recognizable area to the buyer-approved reference and state its relationship to the garment color.
Explain whether the zone separates elements, forms a border or carries a second identity color.
Describe the intended visual role and the lighting context in which the physical sample should be compared.
Name garment color and material because open areas can make the product itself part of the composition.
A mapped file is controlled by its history. Replace phrases such as “latest version” with explicit identities and decisions.
Record the source filename, received date, dimensions, product placement and open questions.
Issue a named version with zone labels, actual-size view and clearly marked interpretation changes.
Number observations, identify affected features and state whether a new proof or physical sample is required.
Name the reviewer, decision, proof identity and scope. Conditional approval should list every unresolved condition.
Lock the accepted file with the garment, application sample, configuration and packing records used for the order.
These answers support a quote-ready handoff without promising that incomplete artwork is automatically suitable for production.
An editable vector source with clear paths is useful because scale and individual artwork zones can be inspected without relying on pixels. Send the buyer-approved file, identify any live type or linked assets and include a readable reference image that shows the intended appearance.
A reference image can explain visual intent, but it may not contain reliable edges, dimensions, colors or ownership of design decisions. If editable source artwork is unavailable, identify that limitation and expect the proposed redraw or interpretation to require explicit buyer approval.
Physical size determines whether lines, counters, gaps and color areas can remain distinct. A map created without a fixed width and height cannot provide a meaningful actual-size review, and scaling it later may change the required arrangement.
Give every intended stone or material zone a stable name, show its boundary clearly and link it to the buyer-approved reference. Avoid relying only on appearance within an unmanaged screen file, especially when similar shades or special visual effects are involved.
Retain the source identity, mapped proof revision, finished dimensions, placement, color-zone references, marked changes, approval decision, date and named reviewer. Superseded proofs should be removed from the active handoff while remaining identifiable in the revision history.
Send Teebling the approved editable source, reference export, physical dimensions, product placement, named color zones, design variants, quantity schedule and a note describing any missing information. That stack lets the first response address the real mapping questions.